•  
  •  
 
Journal of the Association for Information Systems

Abstract

This article presents a critique of a number of shortcomings with the technology acceptance model (TAM) and points to specific remedies in each case. In addition, I present a model for the purposes of providing a foundation for a paradigm shift. The model consists first of a decision making core (goal desire → goal intention → action desire → action intention) that is grounded in basic decision making variables/processes of a universal nature. The decision core also contains a mechanism for self-regulation that moderates the effects of desires on intentions. Second, added to the decision making core are a number of causes and effects of decisions and self-regulatory reasoning, with the aim of introducing potential contingent, contextual nuances for understanding decision making. Many of the causal variables here are contained within TAM or its extensions; also considered are new variables grounded in emotional, group/social/cultural, and goal-directed behavior research.

DOI

10.17705/1jais.00122

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 1393
    • Policy Citations: 5
  • Usage
    • Abstract Views: 13600
    • Downloads: 11911
  • Captures
    • Readers: 2577
  • Mentions
    • References: 2
see details

Share

COinS
 

When commenting on articles, please be friendly, welcoming, respectful and abide by the AIS eLibrary Discussion Thread Code of Conduct posted here.