Author ORCID Identifier
Margeret Hall: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1049-3040
Alexandra Pavlakis: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7165-9732
Michelle Friend: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2020-6079
Abstract
Stakeholder Theory (ST) provides a valuable lens for understanding how firms create value, but it also surfaces how an emphasis on power, legitimacy, and urgency can marginalize vulnerable groups. This commentary argues that IS scholars, by adhering to corporate-driven definitions of stakeholder legitimacy, risk entrenching systems of exclusion rather than challenging them. Firms prioritize principal stakeholders, and shareholders and IS research often mirrors these priorities, reinforcing structures that disadvantage those who would benefit most from inclusive digitization. Drawing on observations from an upskilling program embedded in a homeless shelter, this analysis highlights how IS scholarship can either perpetuate or dismantle marginalizing systems. By critically reflecting on whose interests are served in IS research and practice, this commentary calls for a shift toward more inclusive, justice-oriented approaches that extend beyond performative inclusion and address the structural barriers that exclude society’s most vulnerable.
DOI
10.17705/1CAIS.05729
Recommended Citation
Hall, M., Pavlakis, A., & Friend, M. (2025). Who Counts? A Compassionate Critique of Stakeholder Theory in Information Systems. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 57, 672-682. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.05729
When commenting on articles, please be friendly, welcoming, respectful and abide by the AIS eLibrary Discussion Thread Code of Conduct posted here.
