In this paper, I respond to the six rejoinders to my original paper. I categorize the rejoinders into three groups depending on whether they largely disagree with my suggestions, whether they mostly agree with them, or whether they suggest largely complementary ideas to my own. In line with my own paper (Iivari, 2016), I specifically focus on the concrete proposals how to improve the situation.
"Iivari’s Response to the Rejoinders on How to Improve Peer Reviewing,"
Communications of the Association for Information Systems:
Vol. 38, Article 19.
Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol38/iss1/19