In this rejoinder to Iivari (2016), I discuss authors’ responsibilities in the process of ensuring quality reviews. I argue that one overlooked element in quality peer reviewing is authors’ unconstrained right to submit manuscripts in whatever form or quality they desire. As such, I suggest adding some constraints and offering more freedom to reviewers to maintain viability of the scholarly publication system. I offer three responses to Iivari’s suggestions and add two further suggestions for change.
"Author Responsibilities in Improving the Quality of Peer Reviews: A Rejoinder to Iivari (2016),"
Communications of the Association for Information Systems:
Vol. 38, Article 18.
Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol38/iss1/18