Abstract
The paper presents a novel approach to re-identifying the trade-off model in analytical decision-making processes, using SITW and S-TFN techniques and the TOPSIS method. Focusing on the importance of criteria weights and benchmarks, the study compares the proposed methods with traditional approaches such as CRITIC-TOPSIS. The results show the higher efficiency of SITW and S-TFN in correlation with the trade-off ranking. The proposed techniques open up new possibilities in re-identifying decision-making models, emphasizing the importance of precise determination of weights and reference points.
Paper Type
Poster
DOI
10.62036/ISD.2024.93
Reidentifying The Compromise Model in The Analytical Decision Process: Application of The SITW And S-TFN Approaches
The paper presents a novel approach to re-identifying the trade-off model in analytical decision-making processes, using SITW and S-TFN techniques and the TOPSIS method. Focusing on the importance of criteria weights and benchmarks, the study compares the proposed methods with traditional approaches such as CRITIC-TOPSIS. The results show the higher efficiency of SITW and S-TFN in correlation with the trade-off ranking. The proposed techniques open up new possibilities in re-identifying decision-making models, emphasizing the importance of precise determination of weights and reference points.
Recommended Citation
Kizielewicz, B. & Sałabun, W. (2024). Reidentifying The Compromise Model in The Analytical Decision Process: Application of The SITW And S-TFN Approaches. In B. Marcinkowski, A. Przybylek, A. Jarzębowicz, N. Iivari, E. Insfran, M. Lang, H. Linger, & C. Schneider (Eds.), Harnessing Opportunities: Reshaping ISD in the post-COVID-19 and Generative AI Era (ISD2024 Proceedings). Gdańsk, Poland: University of Gdańsk. ISBN: 978-83-972632-0-8. https://doi.org/10.62036/ISD.2024.93