Abstract

After more than 30 years of research into computer self-efficacy (CSE), it is important to assess the progress made on this construct and whether we need to reconsider its conceptualization and nomological network. To do so, we used meta-analytic techniques to review 683 papers and aggregated results across 749 independent samples. Our results suggest that out of 30 variables suggested by Marakas et al. (1998) in their narrative review, only 7 were sufficiently examined to warrant inclusion in an empirical meta-analysis, while at the same time our analysis identifies 18 variables that had not been examined as part of CSE’s nomological network. The research also indicates that relationships are robust and consistent across 11 potential categorical and continuous moderators, suggesting few moderators in a relationship with CSE. Evidence suggests that national culture and the setting where a study is conducted can moderate the relationship between CSE and such variables. Although these findings are consistent with current theory, much work remains if we wish to systematically test a theoretical understanding of how CSE is formed and influences performance. Our work confirms CSE’s continuing relevance in managing contemporary work environments and offers directions for future research.

DOI

10.17705/1jais.00969

Download

Share

COinS