Abstract

As urban populations grow and cities confront complex governance challenges, local e-Government assessments have emerged as critical tools for enhancing the efficiency, responsiveness, and inclusivity of smart city initiatives. This paper investigates how structured evaluation frameworks embedded within municipal digital governance systems can optimize public service delivery and promote sustainable urban innovation. Through a comparative case study approach, the research analyses six cities, Amsterdam, Milan, Barcelona, Seoul, Cape Town, and New York, each recognized for domain-specific leadership in AI ethics, environmental sustainability, civic engagement, data governance, digital inclusion, and operational efficiency. Findings reveal that well-designed local assessment mechanisms significantly contribute to improvements in transparency, accountability, citizen trust, and real-time decision-making. Common success factors include the integration of quantitative metrics with qualitative feedback, iterative service optimization, and clear reporting protocols. Each city’s approach demonstrates how digital governance can be tailored to local socio-political and infrastructural contexts while maintaining agility and impact. The study highlights that the use of e-Government assessments not only strengthens policy alignment and performance monitoring but also empowers stakeholders by institutionalizing participatory and data-informed governance. While challenges such as data integration, digital literacy gaps, and institutional continuity remain, the evidence suggests that adaptable, ethically grounded assessment frameworks are essential for long-term smart city success. These insights provide a practical roadmap for policymakers, urban planners, and civic technologists aiming to replicate or scale such frameworks in other urban contexts globally.

Download

Share

COinS