Abstract

This poster introduces Cx, an expert-based composite index for assessing ICT-related risk in adversarial organizational contexts. The index estimates an organization's defensive capability against cyber adversaries by combining technical, organizational, and attacker-oriented factors in a weighted scoring model. The method was developed through a literature-informed design process and an expert-panel refinement stage. The paper describes factor definitions, scoring rules, weighting logic, and interpretation ranges, and positions Cx as a decision-support tool for managers and information systems governance. A compact illustrative comparison shows how Cx supports structured comparison and communication of assessment results. The poster positions Cx as a preliminary methodological artifact requiring empirical validation.

Recommended Citation

Jatkiewicz, P.(2026). An Expert-Based Composite Index for ICT Risk Assessment in Adversarial Organizational Contexts. In M. Valenta, B. Mannová, R. Pergl, A. Przybylek, M. Lang, H. Linger, C. Schneider, N. Iivari, & E. Insfran (Eds.), Making ISD Sustainable: Reloaded with AI and Automation (ISD2026 Proceedings). Prague, Czech Republic: Czech Technical University in Prague. ISBN: 978-80-01-07585-2. https://doi.org/10.62036/ISD.2026.112

Paper Type

Poster

DOI

10.62036/ISD.2026.112

Share

COinS
 

An Expert-Based Composite Index for ICT Risk Assessment in Adversarial Organizational Contexts

This poster introduces Cx, an expert-based composite index for assessing ICT-related risk in adversarial organizational contexts. The index estimates an organization's defensive capability against cyber adversaries by combining technical, organizational, and attacker-oriented factors in a weighted scoring model. The method was developed through a literature-informed design process and an expert-panel refinement stage. The paper describes factor definitions, scoring rules, weighting logic, and interpretation ranges, and positions Cx as a decision-support tool for managers and information systems governance. A compact illustrative comparison shows how Cx supports structured comparison and communication of assessment results. The poster positions Cx as a preliminary methodological artifact requiring empirical validation.