Abstract

This study investigates whether psychological safety may be at risk during the implementation of the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) in a large Swedish insurance company. Using two organization-wide survey waves, one administered at the implementation stage of SAFe and the other approximately 2.5 years later, psychological safety was measured, and mean levels were compared across waves. Results show a statistically significant decrease in psychological safety over time (mean difference = 0.31, p = .02; small-to-moderate effect, d = 0.414). The findings are consistent with concerns that multiteam level coordination and public commitment-making may be associated with higher perceived interpersonal risk. These findings suggest that psychological safety may be part of the “hidden cost” landscape of scaling: an outcome that matters because large-scale software development relies on speaking up about risks and dependencies.

Recommended Citation

Gustavsson, T. & Johansson, J.(2026). Does Scaling Agile Undermine Psychological Safety? A Two-Wave Study of a SAFe Transformation. In M. Valenta, B. Mannová, R. Pergl, A. Przybylek, M. Lang, H. Linger, C. Schneider, N. Iivari, & E. Insfran (Eds.), Making ISD Sustainable: Reloaded with AI and Automation (ISD2026 Proceedings). Prague, Czech Republic: Czech Technical University in Prague. ISBN: 978-80-01-07585-2. https://doi.org/10.62036/ISD.2026.24

Paper Type

Full Paper

DOI

10.62036/ISD.2026.24

Share

COinS
 

Does Scaling Agile Undermine Psychological Safety? A Two-Wave Study of a SAFe Transformation

This study investigates whether psychological safety may be at risk during the implementation of the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) in a large Swedish insurance company. Using two organization-wide survey waves, one administered at the implementation stage of SAFe and the other approximately 2.5 years later, psychological safety was measured, and mean levels were compared across waves. Results show a statistically significant decrease in psychological safety over time (mean difference = 0.31, p = .02; small-to-moderate effect, d = 0.414). The findings are consistent with concerns that multiteam level coordination and public commitment-making may be associated with higher perceived interpersonal risk. These findings suggest that psychological safety may be part of the “hidden cost” landscape of scaling: an outcome that matters because large-scale software development relies on speaking up about risks and dependencies.