Paper Number
1042
Paper Type
Complete Research Paper
Abstract
This paper explores the attitudes of German judges towards the use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems for supporting their professional tasks. We conducted interviews with 20 judges to explore tasks that could potentially be automated and to assess their willingness to use specific AI systems designed for mass proceedings, risk assessment, and sentencing. The study used technology acceptance models as a theoretical basis, particularly the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. The findings reveal that judges identify time-consuming routine activities suitable for automation, such as issuing orders and assessing eligibility for legal aid. AI systems are generally accepted in mass proceedings, while the use of risk assessment algorithms remains controversial. Sentencing databases for researching comparable cases are mostly positively received. The study contributes to understanding AI in the judiciary and highlights the need for continuous research to ensure responsible development and integration of AI within the justice system.
Recommended Citation
Dhungel, Anna-Katharina and Beute, Eva, "AI Systems in the Judiciary: Amicus Curiae? Interviews with Judges on Acceptance and Potential Use of Intelligent Algorithms" (2024). ECIS 2024 Proceedings. 7.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2024/track06_humanaicollab/track06_humanaicollab/7
AI Systems in the Judiciary: Amicus Curiae? Interviews with Judges on Acceptance and Potential Use of Intelligent Algorithms
This paper explores the attitudes of German judges towards the use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems for supporting their professional tasks. We conducted interviews with 20 judges to explore tasks that could potentially be automated and to assess their willingness to use specific AI systems designed for mass proceedings, risk assessment, and sentencing. The study used technology acceptance models as a theoretical basis, particularly the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. The findings reveal that judges identify time-consuming routine activities suitable for automation, such as issuing orders and assessing eligibility for legal aid. AI systems are generally accepted in mass proceedings, while the use of risk assessment algorithms remains controversial. Sentencing databases for researching comparable cases are mostly positively received. The study contributes to understanding AI in the judiciary and highlights the need for continuous research to ensure responsible development and integration of AI within the justice system.
When commenting on articles, please be friendly, welcoming, respectful and abide by the AIS eLibrary Discussion Thread Code of Conduct posted here.