Paper Number
1490
Paper Type
Short Paper
Abstract
While the potential for technology to better facilitate participatory planning processes is widely recognized, research in this interdisciplinary field is at an early stage, especially regarding the normative and instrumental agenda. This paper presents findings from a qualitative case study which explores the state of eParticipation in Norway, focusing on initiatives within a Norwegian municipality. Through semi-structured interviews with municipal employees and affiliated experts from the field, we aim to explore the state of the legal infrastructure and the role of technology. Our findings reveal ambiguous and insufficiently developed guidelines and policies, hindering the effective implementation of ICT for inclusive engagement. The next phase of this research aims to pinpoint areas of improvement in the regulatory landscape concerning digital participation.
Recommended Citation
Sokolaj, Ursula and Grundstrom, Casandra, "Regulatory Ambiguity and Implications for Eparticipation: A Case Study in Norway" (2024). ECIS 2024 Proceedings. 14.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2024/track01_peoplefirst/track01_peoplefirst/14
Regulatory Ambiguity and Implications for Eparticipation: A Case Study in Norway
While the potential for technology to better facilitate participatory planning processes is widely recognized, research in this interdisciplinary field is at an early stage, especially regarding the normative and instrumental agenda. This paper presents findings from a qualitative case study which explores the state of eParticipation in Norway, focusing on initiatives within a Norwegian municipality. Through semi-structured interviews with municipal employees and affiliated experts from the field, we aim to explore the state of the legal infrastructure and the role of technology. Our findings reveal ambiguous and insufficiently developed guidelines and policies, hindering the effective implementation of ICT for inclusive engagement. The next phase of this research aims to pinpoint areas of improvement in the regulatory landscape concerning digital participation.
When commenting on articles, please be friendly, welcoming, respectful and abide by the AIS eLibrary Discussion Thread Code of Conduct posted here.