Paper Type

ERF

Abstract

As e-government systems increasingly adopt artificial intelligence (AI), questions of public trust, transparency, and privacy become critical barriers to—or enablers of—e-participation and e-inclusion. This emergent research investigates what conditions shape citizen trust in AI-driven digital government services, and how trust—or its absence—shapes the character of citizen engagement. Grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and institutional trust theory, three themes emerged from semi-structured interviews with 35 participants: trust is source-dependent, transparency is a prerequisite for meaningful consent, and privacy fears constitute a structural barrier to e-inclusion. Findings suggest that distrust does not produce disengagement—it produces qualitatively diminished engagement: more guarded, resistive, and less authentic. This research identifies an opt-out paradox: in compulsory service contexts, citizens must engage regardless of trust disposition, shifting the relevant outcome from willingness to engage toward the character of engagement. Implications for e-participation design and AI governance are discussed.

Paper Number

1335

Comments

SIG E-GOV

Download

Share

COinS
 
Aug 15th, 12:00 AM

Compelled But Not Cooperative: Public Trust and Engagement Character in AI-Enabled Government

As e-government systems increasingly adopt artificial intelligence (AI), questions of public trust, transparency, and privacy become critical barriers to—or enablers of—e-participation and e-inclusion. This emergent research investigates what conditions shape citizen trust in AI-driven digital government services, and how trust—or its absence—shapes the character of citizen engagement. Grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and institutional trust theory, three themes emerged from semi-structured interviews with 35 participants: trust is source-dependent, transparency is a prerequisite for meaningful consent, and privacy fears constitute a structural barrier to e-inclusion. Findings suggest that distrust does not produce disengagement—it produces qualitatively diminished engagement: more guarded, resistive, and less authentic. This research identifies an opt-out paradox: in compulsory service contexts, citizens must engage regardless of trust disposition, shifting the relevant outcome from willingness to engage toward the character of engagement. Implications for e-participation design and AI governance are discussed.

When commenting on articles, please be friendly, welcoming, respectful and abide by the AIS eLibrary Discussion Thread Code of Conduct posted here.