Paper Number
ICIS2025-1750
Paper Type
Complete
Abstract
This paper investigates how public information systems (IS) in Finland mediate the integration of refugees, focusing on trauma-informed design and infrastructural coordination. Drawing on 40 interviews with stakeholders across governmental, municipal, and NGO sectors, we examine how IS—ranging from residency platforms to AI-based support tools—enable or constrain access to essential services. Our findings reveal gaps in interoperability, language accessibility, and emotional responsiveness, which hinder equitable digital participation. Refugees often experience trauma-related cognitive burdens that reduce trust and usability, challenging assumptions of rational IS adoption. We extend digital divide theory by incorporating trauma-informed design principles and propose practical guidelines for building inclusive, secure, and emotionally attuned digital infrastructures. The paper contributes to IS research by theorizing the socio-technical complexities of public infrastructure in humanitarian settings, offering insights for designing systems that are not only efficient but just, user-sensitive, and capable of fostering integration, dignity, and resilience for displaced populations. Keywords: public information systems, refugee management, trauma-informed design, digital divide, humanitarian context
Recommended Citation
Ocheredko, Olena and Siemon, Dominik, "Beyond Access: Rethinking Refugee Integration through Information Systems" (2025). ICIS 2025 Proceedings. 8.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2025/public_is/public_is/8
Beyond Access: Rethinking Refugee Integration through Information Systems
This paper investigates how public information systems (IS) in Finland mediate the integration of refugees, focusing on trauma-informed design and infrastructural coordination. Drawing on 40 interviews with stakeholders across governmental, municipal, and NGO sectors, we examine how IS—ranging from residency platforms to AI-based support tools—enable or constrain access to essential services. Our findings reveal gaps in interoperability, language accessibility, and emotional responsiveness, which hinder equitable digital participation. Refugees often experience trauma-related cognitive burdens that reduce trust and usability, challenging assumptions of rational IS adoption. We extend digital divide theory by incorporating trauma-informed design principles and propose practical guidelines for building inclusive, secure, and emotionally attuned digital infrastructures. The paper contributes to IS research by theorizing the socio-technical complexities of public infrastructure in humanitarian settings, offering insights for designing systems that are not only efficient but just, user-sensitive, and capable of fostering integration, dignity, and resilience for displaced populations. Keywords: public information systems, refugee management, trauma-informed design, digital divide, humanitarian context
When commenting on articles, please be friendly, welcoming, respectful and abide by the AIS eLibrary Discussion Thread Code of Conduct posted here.
Comments
20-PublicIS