Start Date
14-12-2012 12:00 AM
Description
Utilizing the growth-theory and the theory of complementarities as the guiding theoretical-lenses, this study examines the impact of governance dimensions, namely, voice and accountability, political-stability, government-effectiveness, regulatory-quality, rule-of-law, and control-of-corruption on e-government-maturity in a country. Based on publicly available archival-data from 183 countries, for a cross-sectional period of 2004 to 2008, our results generally supported the hypothesized-model. Results indicate that voice and accountability was negatively related to e-government-maturity. Also, while political-stability, government-effectiveness, regulatory-quality and rule-of-law were positively related to e-government-maturity, control-of-corruption was not significantly associated with it. Further, while regulatory-quality (and control-of-corruption) positively moderated the effect of government-effectiveness (and rule-of-law) on e-government-maturity, the relationship of voice and accountability with e-government-maturity was not contingent on political-stability. Our findings contribute to the theoretical discourse on “governance–e-government-maturity” by identifying the critical roles of governance dimensions in a country, and provide indications to practice on enhancing its e-government-maturity by managing the governance quality.
Recommended Citation
Krishnan, Satish and Teo, Thompson, "Does Governance Matter? Investigating the Impact of Governance on E-Government Maturity" (2012). ICIS 2012 Proceedings. 9.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2012/proceedings/GovernanceManagement/9
Does Governance Matter? Investigating the Impact of Governance on E-Government Maturity
Utilizing the growth-theory and the theory of complementarities as the guiding theoretical-lenses, this study examines the impact of governance dimensions, namely, voice and accountability, political-stability, government-effectiveness, regulatory-quality, rule-of-law, and control-of-corruption on e-government-maturity in a country. Based on publicly available archival-data from 183 countries, for a cross-sectional period of 2004 to 2008, our results generally supported the hypothesized-model. Results indicate that voice and accountability was negatively related to e-government-maturity. Also, while political-stability, government-effectiveness, regulatory-quality and rule-of-law were positively related to e-government-maturity, control-of-corruption was not significantly associated with it. Further, while regulatory-quality (and control-of-corruption) positively moderated the effect of government-effectiveness (and rule-of-law) on e-government-maturity, the relationship of voice and accountability with e-government-maturity was not contingent on political-stability. Our findings contribute to the theoretical discourse on “governance–e-government-maturity” by identifying the critical roles of governance dimensions in a country, and provide indications to practice on enhancing its e-government-maturity by managing the governance quality.