Location
Online
Event Website
https://hicss.hawaii.edu/
Start Date
3-1-2022 12:00 AM
End Date
7-1-2022 12:00 AM
Description
Phishing is the practice of deceiving humans into disclosing sensitive information or inappropriately granting access to a secure system. Unfortunately, there is a severe lack of theoretical models to adequately explain and predict the cognitive dynamics underlying end-user susceptibility to phishing emails. This paper reports findings from an Instance-Based Learning (IBL) model developed to predict human response to emails obtained from a laboratory experiment. Particularly, this work investigates the effectiveness of using established natural language processing methods, such as LSA, GloVe, and BERT, to represent email text within IBL models. We found that using representations that consider contextual meanings assigned by humans could enable IBL agents to predict human response with high accuracy (>80%). In addition, we found that traditional NLP methods that capture semantic meanings in natural language may not be effective at representing how people may encode and recall email messages. We discuss the implications of these findings.
Modeling Phishing Decision using Instance Based Learning and Natural Language Processing
Online
Phishing is the practice of deceiving humans into disclosing sensitive information or inappropriately granting access to a secure system. Unfortunately, there is a severe lack of theoretical models to adequately explain and predict the cognitive dynamics underlying end-user susceptibility to phishing emails. This paper reports findings from an Instance-Based Learning (IBL) model developed to predict human response to emails obtained from a laboratory experiment. Particularly, this work investigates the effectiveness of using established natural language processing methods, such as LSA, GloVe, and BERT, to represent email text within IBL models. We found that using representations that consider contextual meanings assigned by humans could enable IBL agents to predict human response with high accuracy (>80%). In addition, we found that traditional NLP methods that capture semantic meanings in natural language may not be effective at representing how people may encode and recall email messages. We discuss the implications of these findings.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/hicss-55/dg/cyber_deception/3