Paper Number

ECIS2026-2718

Paper Type

SP

Abstract

While the rapid spread of misinformation on social media has detrimental societal consequences, the linguistic features that drive false news spread on social media platforms are not fully understood. To better explain why misinformation on content-rich sites like YouTube receives attention, this study compares the language of true and false videos. Specifically, the present work used the emotional tone (e.g., anger), arousal cues (e.g., “terrorist attack”), and certainty cues (e.g., “definitely”) of 720 videos (416 videos with accurate information and 304 with inaccurate information) to predict user engagement. Findings indicate that emotions, particularly anger and disgust, as well as the use of certainty-laden language, were positively associated with higher engagement in misinformation videos than true videos.

Share

COinS
 
Jun 14th, 12:00 AM

Not Just Wrong, But Convincing: How Emotion And Confidence Drive Engagement With Misinformation On Youtube

While the rapid spread of misinformation on social media has detrimental societal consequences, the linguistic features that drive false news spread on social media platforms are not fully understood. To better explain why misinformation on content-rich sites like YouTube receives attention, this study compares the language of true and false videos. Specifically, the present work used the emotional tone (e.g., anger), arousal cues (e.g., “terrorist attack”), and certainty cues (e.g., “definitely”) of 720 videos (416 videos with accurate information and 304 with inaccurate information) to predict user engagement. Findings indicate that emotions, particularly anger and disgust, as well as the use of certainty-laden language, were positively associated with higher engagement in misinformation videos than true videos.