An Update for Taxonomy Designers

Authors

Dennis Kundisch, Universität PaderbonFollow
Jan Muntermann, University of GöttingenFollow
Anna Oberlaender, University of AugsburgFollow
Daniel Rau, University of AugsburgFollow
Maximilian Röglinger, Research Center FIM, University of BayreuthFollow
Thorsten Schoormann, Universitat HildesheimFollow
Daniel Szopinski, Paderborn UniversityFollow

Document Type

Research Paper

Abstract

Taxonomies are classification systems that help researchers conceptualize phenomena based on their dimensions and characteristics. To address the problem of ‘ad-hoc’ taxonomy building, Nickerson et al. (2013) proposed a rigorous taxonomy development method for information systems researchers. Eight years on, however, the status quo of taxonomy research shows that the application of this method lacks consistency and transparency and that further guidance on taxonomy evaluation is needed. To fill these gaps, this study (1) advances existing methodological guidance and (2) extends this guidance with regards to taxonomy evaluation. Informed by insights gained from an analysis of 164 taxonomy articles published in information systems outlets, this study presents an extended taxonomy design process together with 26 operational taxonomy design recommendations. Representing an update for taxonomy designers, it contributes to the prescriptive knowledge on taxonomy design and seeks to augment both rigorous taxonomy building and evaluation.

Recommended Citation

Kundisch, Dennis; Muntermann, Jan; Oberlaender, Anna; Rau, Daniel; Röglinger, Maximilian; Schoormann, Thorsten; and Szopinski, Daniel (2022) "An Update for Taxonomy Designers," Business & Information Systems Engineering: Vol. 64: Iss. 4, 421-439.
Available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/bise/vol64/iss4/3