Paper Type

ERF

Abstract

This study advances trust calibration research by examining AI-supported infectious disease triage, where uncertainty and constrained feedback limit users’ ability to evaluate system performance. By focusing on time-sensitive reliance decisions under information asymmetry, it extends calibration research beyond low-stakes, feedback-rich settings. We employ a quasi-field experiment in which participants make accept-or-reject decisions on AI triage recommendations embedded in clinically realistic scenarios, allowing direct observation of reliance behavior across varying levels of system correctness and feedback clarity.

Paper Number

1184

Comments

SIG HCI

Share

COinS
 
Aug 15th, 12:00 AM

Trust Calibration and Patient Decision in AI-Supported Infectious Disease Triage

This study advances trust calibration research by examining AI-supported infectious disease triage, where uncertainty and constrained feedback limit users’ ability to evaluate system performance. By focusing on time-sensitive reliance decisions under information asymmetry, it extends calibration research beyond low-stakes, feedback-rich settings. We employ a quasi-field experiment in which participants make accept-or-reject decisions on AI triage recommendations embedded in clinically realistic scenarios, allowing direct observation of reliance behavior across varying levels of system correctness and feedback clarity.