Abstract
Information System (IS) success may be the most arguable and important dependent variable in the IS field. The purpose of the present study is to address IS success by empirically assess and compare DeLone and McLean’s (1992) and Gable’s et al. (2008) models of IS success in Australian Universities context. The two models have some commonalities and several important distinctions. Both models integrate and interrelate multiple dimensions of IS success. Hence, it would be useful to compare theclear how IS researchers should respond to this controversy.
Recommended Citation
Rabaa'i, Ahmad A., "Assessing Information Systems Success Models: Empirical Comparison (Research in Progress)" (2009). ACIS 2009 Proceedings. 61.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2009/61