Paper Type
ERF
Abstract
Adaptive learning environments employ artificial intelligence (AI) to personalize education by dynamically adjusting task complexity in response to learner performance. While prior research emphasizes the motivational benefits of these systems, the interaction between flow and cognitive load remains insufficiently examined. Drawing on Flow Theory and Cognitive Load Theory, this study investigates how AI-driven task complexity adaptation shapes engagement, cognitive effort, and learning performance. We hypothesize that cognitive load, when maintained within an optimal range, fosters flow experiences that enhance learning outcomes. A between-subjects experimental design with 560 business school students compares adaptive and static learning conditions using OATutor, an AI-driven platform. Cognitive load is assessed through validated self-report measures, while flow is measured through both electroencephalography (EEG) and psychometric scales. The findings will advance theoretical understanding of adaptive learning and inform the design of intelligent systems that balance engagement and cognitive efficiency for improved learning performance.
Paper Number
1726
Recommended Citation
Omezzine, Mohamed Amir, "Keeping Learners in the Flow: How AI-Driven Personalization Balances Cognitive Load and Enhances Performance" (2025). AMCIS 2025 Proceedings. 33.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2025/is_education/is_education/33
Keeping Learners in the Flow: How AI-Driven Personalization Balances Cognitive Load and Enhances Performance
Adaptive learning environments employ artificial intelligence (AI) to personalize education by dynamically adjusting task complexity in response to learner performance. While prior research emphasizes the motivational benefits of these systems, the interaction between flow and cognitive load remains insufficiently examined. Drawing on Flow Theory and Cognitive Load Theory, this study investigates how AI-driven task complexity adaptation shapes engagement, cognitive effort, and learning performance. We hypothesize that cognitive load, when maintained within an optimal range, fosters flow experiences that enhance learning outcomes. A between-subjects experimental design with 560 business school students compares adaptive and static learning conditions using OATutor, an AI-driven platform. Cognitive load is assessed through validated self-report measures, while flow is measured through both electroencephalography (EEG) and psychometric scales. The findings will advance theoretical understanding of adaptive learning and inform the design of intelligent systems that balance engagement and cognitive efficiency for improved learning performance.
When commenting on articles, please be friendly, welcoming, respectful and abide by the AIS eLibrary Discussion Thread Code of Conduct posted here.
Comments
SIGED