Description
Lack of accountability and transparency are major impediments in efforts to minimize delays, ensure due process of law and reduce backlogged cases in the criminal justice system of . Existing oversight mechanisms to track cases through physical files and archives are prone to tampering and damage. The problem is particularly acute since there is little or no coordination between police, prosecution, and courts. There is no meaningful consolidation of crime and prosecution analytics and a total absence of transparency in the process. The current system makes it difficult to see who’s holding the proverbial bag. _x000D_ This paper presents results from a first of its-kind survey of our criminal justice system in . We highlight the importance and policy implications of our work by presenting empirical data from 750 prosecution vouchers using the results to motivate a case-flow design that integrates and maps the case-management practices of all three institutions involved.
Recommended Citation
Farooqi, Shehroze; Naeem, umer; Rafi, usama; Zaffar, Fareed; and Zaffar, Muhammad Adeel, "Who’s holding the bag? Accountability in the criminal justice system" (2015). AMCIS 2015 Proceedings. 8.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2015/eGov/GeneralPresentations/8
Who’s holding the bag? Accountability in the criminal justice system
Lack of accountability and transparency are major impediments in efforts to minimize delays, ensure due process of law and reduce backlogged cases in the criminal justice system of . Existing oversight mechanisms to track cases through physical files and archives are prone to tampering and damage. The problem is particularly acute since there is little or no coordination between police, prosecution, and courts. There is no meaningful consolidation of crime and prosecution analytics and a total absence of transparency in the process. The current system makes it difficult to see who’s holding the proverbial bag. _x000D_ This paper presents results from a first of its-kind survey of our criminal justice system in . We highlight the importance and policy implications of our work by presenting empirical data from 750 prosecution vouchers using the results to motivate a case-flow design that integrates and maps the case-management practices of all three institutions involved.