Abstract
For many years, factors that increase the competitive advantage of organizations have been studied in organizational research. For an Information Technology (IT) organization, the main issues are the fitness of the IT and organization strategies and methods for revitalizing IT knowledge management (Earl, 2001; Rathnam, Johnsen, & Wen, 2005; Zack, 2002). However, there are few studies that have evaluated the competitiveness of an organization with reference to the correspondence of these constituent factors with organizational objectives. In this research a multi-contingency view was applied to Korean agencies, and the regional agencies with good performance and those with poor performance were compared with regard to this measure of fitness. The results of this study confirmed that the regions that received a favorable evaluation from experts exhibited good fit overall, and the constituent parts of the organization were consistent with the firm’s objectives.
Recommended Citation
Kim, Minjeong; Ah Ahn, Kyeong; Chan Choe, Young; Rhee, Cheul; and Park, Wooseok, "A Qualitative Study on the Difference in Organizational Fit of IT Supporting Organizations" (2012). AMCIS 2012 Proceedings. 6.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2012/proceedings/OrganizationalIssuesIS/6
A Qualitative Study on the Difference in Organizational Fit of IT Supporting Organizations
For many years, factors that increase the competitive advantage of organizations have been studied in organizational research. For an Information Technology (IT) organization, the main issues are the fitness of the IT and organization strategies and methods for revitalizing IT knowledge management (Earl, 2001; Rathnam, Johnsen, & Wen, 2005; Zack, 2002). However, there are few studies that have evaluated the competitiveness of an organization with reference to the correspondence of these constituent factors with organizational objectives. In this research a multi-contingency view was applied to Korean agencies, and the regional agencies with good performance and those with poor performance were compared with regard to this measure of fitness. The results of this study confirmed that the regions that received a favorable evaluation from experts exhibited good fit overall, and the constituent parts of the organization were consistent with the firm’s objectives.