•  
  •  
 

Journal of Information Technology

Document Type

Research Article

Abstract

While blockchain technologies are widely portrayed as a decentralising force, enterprise blockchains tend to reproduce centralised governance structures. To explain this paradox, we conducted a deductive, explanatory, multi-case study of four enterprise blockchains during their formative stage: Walmart DL Freight, Contour, Chronicled MediLedger, and Car- dossier. We examine how variations in platform openness (the breadth of access to governance arenas) and participant inclusiveness (the depth of stakeholder influence on governance decisions) shape decentralisation trajectories as imprinting mechanisms: formative conditions that embed power asymmetries into sociotechnical infrastructures, constraining sub- sequent governance evolution. Empirically, we find that high openness and high inclusiveness supported decentralisation, low levels of both reinforced centralisation, and asymmetric configurations resulted in hybrid, semi-decentralised ar- rangements. Theoretically, we contribute a variance model that explains how early governance configurations shape decentralisation trajectories in enterprise blockchains. These contributions have practical implications for organisations designing blockchain governance: formative decisions around openness and inclusiveness can cast long institutional shadows, making early strategic alignment critical for realising blockchain’s decentralisation potential

DOI

10.1177/02683962261422482

Share

COinS