Journal of Information Technology
Document Type
Research Article
Abstract
While blockchain technologies are widely portrayed as a decentralising force, enterprise blockchains tend to reproduce centralised governance structures. To explain this paradox, we conducted a deductive, explanatory, multi-case study of four enterprise blockchains during their formative stage: Walmart DL Freight, Contour, Chronicled MediLedger, and Car- dossier. We examine how variations in platform openness (the breadth of access to governance arenas) and participant inclusiveness (the depth of stakeholder influence on governance decisions) shape decentralisation trajectories as imprinting mechanisms: formative conditions that embed power asymmetries into sociotechnical infrastructures, constraining sub- sequent governance evolution. Empirically, we find that high openness and high inclusiveness supported decentralisation, low levels of both reinforced centralisation, and asymmetric configurations resulted in hybrid, semi-decentralised ar- rangements. Theoretically, we contribute a variance model that explains how early governance configurations shape decentralisation trajectories in enterprise blockchains. These contributions have practical implications for organisations designing blockchain governance: formative decisions around openness and inclusiveness can cast long institutional shadows, making early strategic alignment critical for realising blockchain’s decentralisation potential
DOI
10.1177/02683962261422482
Recommended Citation
Viguerie, Christophe; Ciriello, Raffaele F.; Zavolokina, Liudmila; and Mathiassen, Lars
(2026)
"Explaining decentralisation in enterprise blockchain governance: The imprint of platform openness and participant inclusiveness,"
Journal of Information Technology: Vol. 41:
Iss.
1, Article 4.
DOI: 10.1177/02683962261422482
Available at:
https://aisel.aisnet.org/jit/vol41/iss1/4