Methodological Practice and Policy for Organisationally and Socially Relevant is Research: An Inclusive–Exclusive Perspective

Authors

Robert M Davison, Department of Information Systems, City University of Hong Kong, Hong KongFollow
Maris G Martinsons, Department of Management, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Document Type

Other

Abstract

In this research paper, we argue that the tendency of Information Systems (IS) researchers to work with a rather parsimonious set of research methods, notably those that follow the positivist tradition, demonstrates a significant degree of methodological exclusiveness. We contend that such an exclusive practice is both counterproductive to good IS research and unethical. Further, it severely and unreasonably limits the extent to which IS research and researchers can contribute to both pressing organisational problems and the scholarly literature. We synthesise our position in a set of four arguments that guide our discussion of the nature and consequences of methodological exclusiveness, as well as possible solutions. We end the paper with an exposition of steps that could be taken to address the current situation.

DOI

10.1057/jit.2011.19

Recommended Citation

Davison, Robert M and Martinsons, Maris G (2011) "Methodological Practice and Policy for Organisationally and Socially Relevant is Research: An Inclusive–Exclusive Perspective," Journal of Information Technology: Vol. 26: Iss. 4, Article 10.
DOI: 10.1057/jit.2011.19
Available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/jit/vol26/iss4/10