Description
This study aims to test the effect of explicit representation of causal relationships in strategy map component of balanced scorecards BSC on performance evaluations outcomes. To address this aim, a 2 × 2 factorial design laboratory experiment was conducted, where the inclusion of graphical information supporting causal relationships between objectives in strategy maps, and performance outcome patterns (positive vs. negative) across performance measurement perspectives of BCSs were manipulated. The findings show that the observed performance evaluation scores are driven more significantly by the performance outcomes in the outer perspectives of BSCs (financial and learning & growth) than by inner perspectives (internal business processes and customer). It was also confirmed that the difference in performance evaluation scores between two identically structured BSCs with positive versus negative performance outcomes in the outer perspectives is relatively larger in the presence of the strategy map versus when the ordered strategic objective list is presented.
Recommended Citation
Fehrenbacher, Dennis; Liang, Min; Rotaru, Kristian; and Schulz, Axel, "Causal Inference in Strategic Performance Measurement Systems and Its Effect on Performance Evaluations: A Laboratory Experiment" (2015). AMCIS 2015 Proceedings. 5.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2015/AccountingIS/GeneralPresentations/5
Causal Inference in Strategic Performance Measurement Systems and Its Effect on Performance Evaluations: A Laboratory Experiment
This study aims to test the effect of explicit representation of causal relationships in strategy map component of balanced scorecards BSC on performance evaluations outcomes. To address this aim, a 2 × 2 factorial design laboratory experiment was conducted, where the inclusion of graphical information supporting causal relationships between objectives in strategy maps, and performance outcome patterns (positive vs. negative) across performance measurement perspectives of BCSs were manipulated. The findings show that the observed performance evaluation scores are driven more significantly by the performance outcomes in the outer perspectives of BSCs (financial and learning & growth) than by inner perspectives (internal business processes and customer). It was also confirmed that the difference in performance evaluation scores between two identically structured BSCs with positive versus negative performance outcomes in the outer perspectives is relatively larger in the presence of the strategy map versus when the ordered strategic objective list is presented.