Paper Type
Short
Paper Number
PACIS2026-1650
Description
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into work and everyday life occurs not by chance but for some reasons. Studies report diverse behavioural responses to generative AI (GenAI) in higher education, from enthusiastic to defensive. However, the conditions that enable or constrain this integration remain insufficiently understood. This paper develops a socio-technical model, WSTT (will, skill, technology, and task), to explain how the integration of GenAI in higher education (an illustrative example of knowledge work) emerges from individual-technology-institutional interplay of mechanisms. Actor-tool interactions occur within institutional structures that encompass shared norms, discipline, and knowledge systems to shape action. When such mechanisms are activated, they may generate five patterns/events of GenAI integration, including non-use, substitution, augmentation, modification, and redefinition. The model offers a theoretically grounded framework for identifying enablers and barriers to GenAI integration and guides supportive changes in training, work design, or policies that may facilitate effective integration.
Recommended Citation
Namisango, Fatuma; Imtinan, Dr Umera; and Giannakaki, Despoina, "Will, Skill, Tool or Task? Investigating the Mechanisms for Generative AI Integration in Higher Education" (2026). PACIS 2026 Proceedings. 7.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2026/is_education/is_education/7
Will, Skill, Tool or Task? Investigating the Mechanisms for Generative AI Integration in Higher Education
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into work and everyday life occurs not by chance but for some reasons. Studies report diverse behavioural responses to generative AI (GenAI) in higher education, from enthusiastic to defensive. However, the conditions that enable or constrain this integration remain insufficiently understood. This paper develops a socio-technical model, WSTT (will, skill, technology, and task), to explain how the integration of GenAI in higher education (an illustrative example of knowledge work) emerges from individual-technology-institutional interplay of mechanisms. Actor-tool interactions occur within institutional structures that encompass shared norms, discipline, and knowledge systems to shape action. When such mechanisms are activated, they may generate five patterns/events of GenAI integration, including non-use, substitution, augmentation, modification, and redefinition. The model offers a theoretically grounded framework for identifying enablers and barriers to GenAI integration and guides supportive changes in training, work design, or policies that may facilitate effective integration.
Comments
04-DigitalLearning