Paper Type
Short
Paper Number
1035
Description
The rising challenges of health misinformation on social media pose a critical concern, as the persistence and proliferation of inaccurate health news make it difficult for individuals to distinguish between true and false information. This research examines the alignment of perspectives between individuals and health issues, focusing on how this alignment affects the diagnosticity of health information. Two moderators, platform types and health threat impacts, are explored to deepen understanding of their effects. This research underscores the impact of information evaluations when dealing with multi-platform confirmation. Additionally, it addresses the effect of health threats on perspective alignment and their influences. Two experimental studies are proposed to enhance healthcare evaluations, recommending incorporating multiple platforms and deeper reflection on higher-risk health issues to overcome confirmation bias. The guidelines strive to contribute to a more informed and health-conscious society, mitigating the impact of misinformation and enabling informed evaluations based on accurate health information.
Recommended Citation
Lee, Yi-Chen; PENG, Chih-Hung; and Sia, Choon-Ling, "Breaking Bias: Enhancing Healthcare Information Diagnosticity" (2024). PACIS 2024 Proceedings. 2.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2024/track12_hci/track12_hci/2
Breaking Bias: Enhancing Healthcare Information Diagnosticity
The rising challenges of health misinformation on social media pose a critical concern, as the persistence and proliferation of inaccurate health news make it difficult for individuals to distinguish between true and false information. This research examines the alignment of perspectives between individuals and health issues, focusing on how this alignment affects the diagnosticity of health information. Two moderators, platform types and health threat impacts, are explored to deepen understanding of their effects. This research underscores the impact of information evaluations when dealing with multi-platform confirmation. Additionally, it addresses the effect of health threats on perspective alignment and their influences. Two experimental studies are proposed to enhance healthcare evaluations, recommending incorporating multiple platforms and deeper reflection on higher-risk health issues to overcome confirmation bias. The guidelines strive to contribute to a more informed and health-conscious society, mitigating the impact of misinformation and enabling informed evaluations based on accurate health information.
When commenting on articles, please be friendly, welcoming, respectful and abide by the AIS eLibrary Discussion Thread Code of Conduct posted here.
Comments
Human