Paper Number
2372
Paper Type
Complete
Description
Regulators have emphasized on mandating compatibility between competing platform ecosystems. In this paper, we study the welfare implications of compatibility by building a stylized model that reflects the competitive dynamics of the current mobile ecosystems market. We consider a device funded and an ad-funded platform that compete for attracting developers and consumers. If compatibility is mandated on the developer side in a way that eliminates the cost of developers to multi-home, then mandated compatibility reduces the welfare of both consumers and developers because it introduces strategic complementarities that limit platform competition for developers. As a result, developers are charged higher prices which through network externalities imply that also consumers are worse off. If compatibility is mandated on the consumer side, by allowing consumers to multi-home, then under strong network effects it can be a Pareto improvement and result in a win-win outcome for all market participants.
Recommended Citation
Shekhar, Shiva; Petropoulos, Georgios; Van Alstyne, Marshall; and Parker, Geoff, "Mandated Platform Compatibility: Competition and Welfare effects" (2022). ICIS 2022 Proceedings. 11.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2022/general_is/general_is/11
Mandated Platform Compatibility: Competition and Welfare effects
Regulators have emphasized on mandating compatibility between competing platform ecosystems. In this paper, we study the welfare implications of compatibility by building a stylized model that reflects the competitive dynamics of the current mobile ecosystems market. We consider a device funded and an ad-funded platform that compete for attracting developers and consumers. If compatibility is mandated on the developer side in a way that eliminates the cost of developers to multi-home, then mandated compatibility reduces the welfare of both consumers and developers because it introduces strategic complementarities that limit platform competition for developers. As a result, developers are charged higher prices which through network externalities imply that also consumers are worse off. If compatibility is mandated on the consumer side, by allowing consumers to multi-home, then under strong network effects it can be a Pareto improvement and result in a win-win outcome for all market participants.
When commenting on articles, please be friendly, welcoming, respectful and abide by the AIS eLibrary Discussion Thread Code of Conduct posted here.
Comments
02-General