Paper Number
ECIS2026-1946
Paper Type
SP
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (genAI) is increasingly embedded in everyday work processes, yet its effects on users’ sense of ownership and responsibility remain unclear. Drawing on psychological ownership theory, we study how genAI use alters the psychological antecedents through which ownership—and thereby accountability—is formed. In a controlled experiment (N = 138), participants completed a writing task either manually or with a GPT-based assistant. We find that genAI use significantly reduced perceived control, self-investment, object knowledge, and self-congruity, which in turn lowered psychological ownership. We also find that psychological ownership fully mediates the negative effect of genAI assistance on perceived responsibility. We reveal that psychological ownership is a mechanism to explain the responsibility gap in human–AI collaboration. Our findings underscore the importance of designing genAI systems that sustain users’ sense of agency and accountability.
Recommended Citation
Rose, Stefan; Coors, Christopher; and Weinmann, Markus, "Delegated Minds: How Generative AI Assistance Alters Psychological Ownership and Responsibility" (2026). ECIS 2026 Proceedings. 17.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2026/cog_hbis/cog_hbis/17
Delegated Minds: How Generative AI Assistance Alters Psychological Ownership and Responsibility
Generative Artificial Intelligence (genAI) is increasingly embedded in everyday work processes, yet its effects on users’ sense of ownership and responsibility remain unclear. Drawing on psychological ownership theory, we study how genAI use alters the psychological antecedents through which ownership—and thereby accountability—is formed. In a controlled experiment (N = 138), participants completed a writing task either manually or with a GPT-based assistant. We find that genAI use significantly reduced perceived control, self-investment, object knowledge, and self-congruity, which in turn lowered psychological ownership. We also find that psychological ownership fully mediates the negative effect of genAI assistance on perceived responsibility. We reveal that psychological ownership is a mechanism to explain the responsibility gap in human–AI collaboration. Our findings underscore the importance of designing genAI systems that sustain users’ sense of agency and accountability.
When commenting on articles, please be friendly, welcoming, respectful and abide by the AIS eLibrary Discussion Thread Code of Conduct posted here.