Paper Number
ECIS2025-1766
Paper Type
CRP
Abstract
Embodied Conversational Agents have been used to persuade users to change their intention to do healthy behaviours. This study explores users perceptions of a virtual one stop health shop where the user can talk to multiple health coaches (dietician, exercise and cognition) in the same session and the impact on user’s behaviour change intention to do the recommended behaviours.. Each coach varies in human-like empathy expressed during conversation through the inclusion (empathic) or exclusion (neutral) or mix of four types of relational cues: empowerment, working alliance, affirmation and social dialogues. In our between/within- subjects study, 284 participants experienced all three coaches and dialogue styles but in different combinations and orders. Multiple coaches were considered convenient, informative and helpful. Empathic coaches increased intentions to do physical and diet behaviours, whereas the neutral cognitive coach was most effective in encouraging change. This shows empathic dialogue is not always the most persuasive.
Recommended Citation
Salman, Sana and Richards, Deborah, "A ONE-STOP HEALTH SHOP: EXPLORING DIFFERENT CONVERSATIONAL STYLES FOR BEHAVIOUR CHANGE VIA MULTIPLE DIGITAL COACHES" (2025). ECIS 2025 Proceedings. 2.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2025/health_it/health_it/2
A ONE-STOP HEALTH SHOP: EXPLORING DIFFERENT CONVERSATIONAL STYLES FOR BEHAVIOUR CHANGE VIA MULTIPLE DIGITAL COACHES
Embodied Conversational Agents have been used to persuade users to change their intention to do healthy behaviours. This study explores users perceptions of a virtual one stop health shop where the user can talk to multiple health coaches (dietician, exercise and cognition) in the same session and the impact on user’s behaviour change intention to do the recommended behaviours.. Each coach varies in human-like empathy expressed during conversation through the inclusion (empathic) or exclusion (neutral) or mix of four types of relational cues: empowerment, working alliance, affirmation and social dialogues. In our between/within- subjects study, 284 participants experienced all three coaches and dialogue styles but in different combinations and orders. Multiple coaches were considered convenient, informative and helpful. Empathic coaches increased intentions to do physical and diet behaviours, whereas the neutral cognitive coach was most effective in encouraging change. This shows empathic dialogue is not always the most persuasive.
When commenting on articles, please be friendly, welcoming, respectful and abide by the AIS eLibrary Discussion Thread Code of Conduct posted here.