Paper Type
ERF
Abstract
Cybersecurity governance increasingly relies on urgent compliance communication that encourages employees to use generative AI tools to manage workload pressure. While AI-assisted coping is typically assumed to reduce stress, little is known about how method control functions under high-accountability governance conditions. Drawing on the stress–strain–response framework and method-control theory, we examine how AI-assisted coping shapes strain and avoidance in cybersecurity compliance communication. Across two experiments (total N = 315), Experiment 1 employed a 2 × 2 design manipulating urgency (high vs. low) and method control (AI-assisted vs. self-managed). Results reveal that under high urgency, AI-assisted coping increases strain rather than buffering it. Experiment 2 shows that strain predicts avoidance, but this relationship is significant only for older cohorts and not for Gen Z. We introduce “AI Coping Backfire” as a boundary condition of method-control theory in high-accountability governance environments and demonstrate cohort-contingent stress translation in cybersecurity compliance contexts.
Paper Number
1321
Recommended Citation
Singh Rataul, Vipandeep; Al Helaly, Yasser; and Dhillon, Simran, "AI Coping Backfire in Urgent Cybersecurity Governance Communication" (2026). AMCIS 2026 Proceedings. 6.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2026/sig_sec/sig_sec/6
AI Coping Backfire in Urgent Cybersecurity Governance Communication
Cybersecurity governance increasingly relies on urgent compliance communication that encourages employees to use generative AI tools to manage workload pressure. While AI-assisted coping is typically assumed to reduce stress, little is known about how method control functions under high-accountability governance conditions. Drawing on the stress–strain–response framework and method-control theory, we examine how AI-assisted coping shapes strain and avoidance in cybersecurity compliance communication. Across two experiments (total N = 315), Experiment 1 employed a 2 × 2 design manipulating urgency (high vs. low) and method control (AI-assisted vs. self-managed). Results reveal that under high urgency, AI-assisted coping increases strain rather than buffering it. Experiment 2 shows that strain predicts avoidance, but this relationship is significant only for older cohorts and not for Gen Z. We introduce “AI Coping Backfire” as a boundary condition of method-control theory in high-accountability governance environments and demonstrate cohort-contingent stress translation in cybersecurity compliance contexts.
When commenting on articles, please be friendly, welcoming, respectful and abide by the AIS eLibrary Discussion Thread Code of Conduct posted here.
Comments
SIG SEC