Paper Type
Complete
Abstract
We develop a framework to investigate how well top IS journal papers consider boundary conditions when scoping the research, drawing on extant knowledge, or developing and (design) theorizing the findings. Boundary conditions are assumptions about values, time, and space that specify the conditions for relationships in an explanatory theory to hold true until falsified. Despite this prominent role, boundary conditions are one theory component that – unlike constructs, variables, and the relationships between them – have received surprisingly little explicit attention in the literature. Similar considerations exist in design-oriented research around the tension between abstract artefacts / design theories and their applicability to specific contexts. Insufficient attention to boundary conditions may lead to IS research drawing on unsuitable knowledge or making unreflected or too grand claims for the validity, accuracy, or applicability of their findings. We plan to draw on the framework to analyze IS research papers in the future.
Paper Number
1443
Recommended Citation
Drechsler, Andreas; Honigsberg, Sarah; and Watkowski, Laura, "An Analysis Framework to Assess IS Papers’ Consideration of Boundary Conditions" (2025). AMCIS 2025 Proceedings. 1.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2025/sig_phil/sig_phil/1
An Analysis Framework to Assess IS Papers’ Consideration of Boundary Conditions
We develop a framework to investigate how well top IS journal papers consider boundary conditions when scoping the research, drawing on extant knowledge, or developing and (design) theorizing the findings. Boundary conditions are assumptions about values, time, and space that specify the conditions for relationships in an explanatory theory to hold true until falsified. Despite this prominent role, boundary conditions are one theory component that – unlike constructs, variables, and the relationships between them – have received surprisingly little explicit attention in the literature. Similar considerations exist in design-oriented research around the tension between abstract artefacts / design theories and their applicability to specific contexts. Insufficient attention to boundary conditions may lead to IS research drawing on unsuitable knowledge or making unreflected or too grand claims for the validity, accuracy, or applicability of their findings. We plan to draw on the framework to analyze IS research papers in the future.
When commenting on articles, please be friendly, welcoming, respectful and abide by the AIS eLibrary Discussion Thread Code of Conduct posted here.
Comments
SIGPHIL