Paper Type
Complete
Abstract
The widespread use of Facial Recognition Technology (FRT) in law enforcement has triggered ethical, legal, and societal debates, particularly regarding its effectiveness and potential biases. In response, various jurisdictions have implemented regulations. This study examines the impact of full FRT bans on crime clearance rates, focusing on differences across races and genders. The results show a significant decrease in clearance rates following FRT bans, with uniform effects across all demographic groups. These findings challenge assumptions about technological bias and contribute to discussions on technology regulation and AI bias, offering insights for researchers and policymakers.
Paper Number
1342
Recommended Citation
Kim, Jeongmin and Joo, Heejin, "Facial Recognition Technology in Law Enforcement: Regulations, Crime Clearance, and Bias" (2025). AMCIS 2025 Proceedings. 4.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2025/sig_odis/sig_odis/4
Facial Recognition Technology in Law Enforcement: Regulations, Crime Clearance, and Bias
The widespread use of Facial Recognition Technology (FRT) in law enforcement has triggered ethical, legal, and societal debates, particularly regarding its effectiveness and potential biases. In response, various jurisdictions have implemented regulations. This study examines the impact of full FRT bans on crime clearance rates, focusing on differences across races and genders. The results show a significant decrease in clearance rates following FRT bans, with uniform effects across all demographic groups. These findings challenge assumptions about technological bias and contribute to discussions on technology regulation and AI bias, offering insights for researchers and policymakers.
When commenting on articles, please be friendly, welcoming, respectful and abide by the AIS eLibrary Discussion Thread Code of Conduct posted here.
Comments
SIGODIS